The Supreme Court yesterday on its own motion modified its opinion in Kurwa v. Kislinger. The court in Kurwa had determined that a pending cross-complaint precluded appellate jurisdiction of a case. However, the opinion also included some language that was potentially precedentially problematic, or at least that’s what an amicus curiae letter from appellate attorney Jon Eisenberg said. [Disclosures: Jon Eisenberg is of counsel to Horvitz & Levy, and I contributed to the letter.] The court’s modification responds to the letter.